Histology demonstrated HUT in 11 patients and AM in 10 patients. Mean L/B ratios for (V)DMSA and MIBI in HUT and AM were 1.71 ± 0.44 (range 1.0–2.6), 1.2 ± 0.23 (range 1.0–1.6), 1.1 ± 0.06 (range 1.0–1.2) and 1.15 ± 0.05 (range 1.05–1.2), respectively. Ki-67 for HUT ranged from 1 to 20% (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 6.25 ± 5.7) and ER from 0 to 90% (mean ± SD, 43.8 ± 5.7). Ki-67 for AM ranged from 1 to 15% (mean ± SD, 4.83 ± 4.7). In patients with HUT and Ki-67 <3% the mean L/B (V)DMSA ratio was 1.13 ± 0.10, while in those with HUT and Ki-67 >3% it was 1.89 ± 0.35 ( P = 0.0012). In patients with HUT and ER <15% the mean (V)DMSA L/B ratio was 1.66 ± 0.47, while in ER >15% it was 1.73 ± 0.43 (not statistically different). L/B MIBI ratios were not significantly different in the groups with higher or lower Ki-67 and ER values in patients with HUT (1.48 ± 0.45 for Ki-67 <3% and 1.25 ± 0.15 for Ki-67 >3%). AM did not show any statistical difference between L/B (V)DMSA and MIBI in the groups with higher and lower Ki-67 and ER expression. (V)DMSA uptake in HUT seems to be related to Ki-67 activity and could be a useful indicator of the probability of these lesions to progress to atypical hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papantoniou et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: