A combination of ab initio calculations with the isoelectronic principle and chemical intuition is a useful way to predict new species. Some experimentally verified examples are (1) the transition-metal hydrides, MH(n) (n = 4-12), (2) new members of the multiply-bonded 2nd- or 3rd-period species A≡B, A=B=C, A=B=C=D or A≡B-C≡D, and A=B=C=D=E classes, the last-mentioned class including the cations N and OCNCO(+), (3) new members of the uranyl isoelectronic series, (4) actinyls where one of the oxygens is replaced by a 5d transition-metal (TM), (5) certain systems with noble-gas-noble-metal bonds, (6) the first argon compound HArF, (7) the cluster series of WAu(12), (8) TM-centred polyazide anions, (9) covalent molecules with a central -Zn-Zn- bond, (10) tetrahedral clusters of zinc and cadmium, (11) model systems for otherwise missing multiple bonds and (12) certain endohedral A@B systems. Further series of hypothetical species were used as a tool for developing recent sets of covalent radii, for studying the endohedral intermolecular interactions in A@B systems, or for finding examples of a 32-electron rule, corresponding to the well-known 8e- and 18e-rules. For obvious reasons, much of the molecular chemistry of the superheavy elements is based on studies of hypothetical model systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pekka Pyykkö (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: