Background: Upper limb (UL) spasticity and weakness are tightly intertwined in the spastic movement disorders. The combined use of Robot-assisted UL training and Botulinum toxin (BoNT) appear to be a promising therapeutic synergism to improve UL function in chronic stroke patients. Objective: To evaluate the synergistic effects of Robot-assisted UL training and Botulinum toxin on UL spasticity, function, muscle strength and the electromyographic UL muscles activity. Methods: This single-blind, randomised, controlled trial involved 32 chronic stroke outpatients with UL spastic hemiparesis. The experimental group (n = 16) received robot-assisted UL training and BoNT treatment. The control group (n=16) received conventional treatment combined with BoNT treatment. Training protocols lasted for five weeks (45 min/session, two sessions/week). Before and after rehabilitation, a blinded rater evaluated patients. The primary outcome was the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMA) and the Medical Research Council Scale (MRC). The electromyographic activity of 5 UL muscles during the “hand-to-mouth” task was explored in the experimental group and 14 healthy age-matched controls using a surface Electromyography (EMGs). Results: No significant between-group differences on the MAS and FMA were measured. The experimental group reported significantly greater improvements on UL muscle strength (p=0.004), shoulder abduction (p=0.039), extra-rotation (p=0.019) and elbow flexion (p=0.043) than the control group. In the experimental group, muscle strength changes were significantly correlated with FMA changes (r=0,49, p=0.05). EMGs data in the experimental group showed changes in the proximal muscles activity. Conclusions: The combination of Robot-assisted UL training and Botulinum toxin treatment is a promising therapeutic synergism in chronic stroke patients with upper limb spasticity. The instrumental assessment of muscle activity may identify specific UL impairments and suggest specific rehabilitation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gandolfi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: