Key result
Successful adherence to NOACs in atrial fibrillation patients was 75.6%, which is suboptimal, and bleeding events occurred in 7.5% of non-adherent patients.
Why the study?
What is the rate of patient adherence to NOACs in atrial fibrillation and its association with bleeding events?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,600,000)
What is the rate of patient adherence to NOACs in atrial fibrillation and its association with bleeding events?
Adherence to NOACs in real-world AF patients is suboptimal (75.6%), highlighting a need for interventions to improve adherence and optimize clinical outcomes.
Suboptimal real-world NOAC adherence in AF may elevate stroke risk; leaves open need for targeted interventions in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence from published observational studies of adherence to Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) medications and associated clinical outcome events in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients, was reviewed systematically. METHODS: Observational studies assessing patient adherence to NOACs conducted on AF patients between September 2010 and June 2016 were identified by systematic searching keywords to locate eligible studies, in accordance with Cochrane guidelines. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify the studies. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with DerSimonian-Laird weighting to obtain pooled effect sizes. RESULTS: From 185 potentially relevant citations, 6 studies, comprising 1.6 million AF patients, were included. Among these, successful adherence to NOACs occurred in 75.6%. Adherence levels were higher in patients treated with dabigatran (72.7%) compared with those treated with apixaban (59.9%) or rivaroxaban (59.3%). However, adherence was still suboptimal (relative to an expected 80% adherence rate). Bleeding events in non-adherent patients were found to be 7.5%. CONCLUSION: Suboptimal adherence to NOACs among AF patients was highlighted as a significant risk factor that may affect clinical outcomes, with a higher percentage of non-adherent patients having bleeding events. There is an urgent need for research on the effects of specific interventions to improve patient adherence to NOACs and to assess the related outcome factors that may be associated with adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shehab et al. (2018) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial Fibrillation (n=1,600,000). Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) was evaluated on Successful adherence to NOACs. Successful adherence to NOACs in atrial fibrillation patients was 75.6%, which is suboptimal, and bleeding events occurred in 7.5% of non-adherent patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: