Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a double-blind, crossover trial, 7 chronic hemodialysis patients underwent three 4-week treatment periods. During one period, dialysate contained 135 mEq/l sodium. During another period, dialysate contained 143 mEq/l sodium. During the remaining period, we used "sodium gradient' dialysate, the sodium concentration of which was decreased from 160 to 133 mEq/l during each 4-hour dialysis session. Ultrafiltration was performed at a constant rate to achieve a predetermined post-dialysis weight. Interdialytic weight gain, thirst, blood pressure control, and incidence of side effects were monitored. There was a significant difference in interdialytic weight gain for the 3 treatments (p = 0.005). Interdialytic weight gain using 135 mEq/l sodium dialysate (2.2 +/- 0.9 kg, mean +/- SD) was significantly less than that using either 143 mEq/l sodium dialysate (2.6 +/- 0.8 kg) or sodium gradient dialysate (2.8 +/- 0.7 kg). Self-reported thirst tended to be less severe with 135 mEq/l sodium dialysate than with 143 mEq/l sodium dialysate or with sodium gradient dialysate, but changes in thirst were not statistically significant (p = 0.13). The incidence of intradialytic hypotensive episodes was comparable with the 3 levels of dialysate sodium. The results suggest that the described sodium gradient method does not prevent the increased interdialytic weight gain and thirst seen with other forms of high-sodium dialysis, and probably does not reduce the incidence of side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daugirdas et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: