Key result
A low GDF-15 level was significantly associated with left ventricular recovery (≥10% LVEF improvement) in STEMI patients after successful reperfusion (OR 2.93; 95% CI 1.43-6.02; p=0.001).
Why the study?
Determinants of left ventricular recovery after successful revascularization in STEMI are not clear, and the relationship between GDF-15 and LVEF improvement is unknown.
Is a low GDF-15 level associated with left ventricular recovery in STEMI patients after successful primary PCI?
Cohort (n=161)
Is a low GDF-15 level associated with left ventricular recovery in STEMI patients after successful primary PCI?
Lower GDF-15 levels are associated with better left ventricular ejection fraction improvement and less adverse remodeling in STEMI patients following successful primary PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support GDF-15 for identifying LV recovery post-STEMI PCI; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The determinants of left ventricular (LV) recovery after successful revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients are not clear. In addition, the relationship between growth differentiation factor15 (GDF-15) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement is also unknown. This study hypothesizes that a low GDF-15 level would be associated with LVEF recovery. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one STEMI patients were included in this study. Echocardiographic examinations were performed before and 12-18 weeks after discharge. The patients were divided into three groups according to the changes in LVEF as 62 patients with ≥ 10% change, 47 patients with 1-9% change, and 52 patients ≤ 0% change. LV recovery was defined as ≥ 10% LVEF improvement and the predictors of LV recovery were investigated. Moreover, two groups were created according to GDF-15 values, and the follow-up/baseline echocardiographic parameters were compared between these groups. RESULTS: LV recovery was detected in 38.5% of the patients. Low baseline LVEF [odds ratio (OR): 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.94, p = 0.001], low GDF-15 (OR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93, p = 0.004), previous angina (OR: 2.34, 95% CI 1.10-4.96, p = 0.027), and symptom-to-balloon time (OR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, p = 0.043) were independent predictors of LV recovery. The ratios of follow-up/baseline LV end-diastolic volume index, LV end-systolic volume index and wall motion score index were lower in the low GDF-15 group (0.96 vs. 1.04, p < 0.001; 0.96 vs. 1.10, p < 0.001; 0.89 vs. 0.96, p < 0.001). Moreover, being in the low GDF-15 group was associated with LV recovery (OR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.43-6.02, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lower GDF-15 level was associated with better LV improvement and less adverse remodeling in STEMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Somuncu et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=161). Low GDF-15 level vs. High GDF-15 level was evaluated on Left ventricular recovery (≥ 10% LVEF improvement) (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.43-6.02, p=0.001). A low GDF-15 level was significantly associated with left ventricular recovery (≥10% LVEF improvement) in STEMI patients after successful reperfusion (OR 2.93; 95% CI 1.43-6.02; p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: