Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let {X 1 (t), X 2 (t), t ≧ 0} be a bivariate birth and death (Markov) process taking non-negative integer values, such that the process {X 2(t), t ≧ 0} may influence the growth of the process {X 1(t), t ≧ 0}, while the process X 2 (·) itself grows without any influence whatsoever of the first process. The process X 2 (·) is taken to be a simple linear birth and death process with λ 2 and µ 2 as its birth and death rates respectively. The process X 1 (·) is also assumed to be a linear birth and death process but with its birth and death rates depending on X 2 (·) in the following manner: λ (t) = λ 1 (θ + X 2 (t)); µ(t) = µ 1 (θ + X 2 (t)). Here λ i, µi and θ are all non-negative constants. By studying the process X 1 (·), first conditionally given a realization of the process {X 2 (t), t ≧ 0} and then by unconditioning it later on by taking expectation over the process {X 2 (t), t ≧ 0} we obtain explicit solution for G in closed form. Again, it is shown that a proper limit distribution of X 1 (t) always exists as t→∞, except only when both λ 1 > µ 1 and λ 2 > µ 2. Also, certain problems concerning moments of the process, regression of X 1 (t) on X 2 (t); time to extinction, and the duration of the interaction between the two processes, etc., are studied in some detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prem Puri (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: