Key result
Semi-continuous heart rate measures from wrist-worn wearables contain enough information in ultra-low and very-low frequencies to estimate SDNN24 and discriminate cardiovascular risk.
Why the study?
Due to motion artefacts and sensor differences compared to ECG, estimation of SDNN24 has never been performed from wrist-worn wearable fitness trackers.
Does estimation of SDNN24 using semi-continuous heart rate measures from wrist-worn wearables discriminate cardiovascular risk in subjects with low and high cardiovascular risk?
Observational
Does estimation of SDNN24 using semi-continuous heart rate measures from wrist-worn wearables discriminate cardiovascular risk in subjects with low and high cardiovascular risk?
Semi-continuous heart rate measures from wrist-worn wearables may be sufficient to estimate SDNN24 and assess cardiovascular risk, offering a practical alternative to 24-hour ECG monitoring.
May enable wearable-based SDNN24 estimation for CV risk assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The standard deviation of the interval between QRS complexes recorded over 24 h (SDNN24) is an important metric of cardiovascular health. Wrist-worn fitness wearable devices record heart beats 24/7 having a complete overview of users' heart status. Due to motion artefacts affecting QRS complexes recording, and the different nature of the heart rate sensor used on wearable devices compared to ECG, traditionally used to compute SDNN24, the estimation of this important Heart Rate Variability (HRV) metric has never been performed from wearable data. We propose an innovative approach to estimate SDNN24 only exploiting the Heart Rate (HR) that is normally available on wearable fitness trackers and less affected by data noise. The standard deviation of inter-beats intervals (SDNN24) and the standard deviation of the Average inter-beats intervals (ANN) derived from the HR (obtained in a time window with defined duration, i.e., 1, 5, 10, 30 and 60 min), i.e., ANN=60HR (SDANNHR24), were calculated over 24 h. Power spectrum analysis using the Lomb-Scargle Peridogram was performed to assess frequency domain HRV parameters (Ultra Low Frequency, Very Low Frequency, Low Frequency, and High Frequency). Due to the fact that SDNN24 reflects the total power of the power of the HRV spectrum, the values estimated from HR measures (SDANNHR24) underestimate the real values because of the high frequencies that are missing. Subjects with low and high cardiovascular risk show different power spectra. In particular, differences are detected in Ultra Low and Very Low frequencies, while similar results are shown in Low and High frequencies. For this reason, we found that HR measures contain enough information to discriminate cardiovascular risk. Semi-continuous measures of HR throughout 24 h, as measured by most wrist-worn fitness wearable devices, should be sufficient to estimate SDNN24 and cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morelli et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk. Semi-continuous measures of heart rate from wearable devices was evaluated on Estimation of SDNN24 and cardiovascular risk discrimination. Semi-continuous heart rate measures from wrist-worn wearables contain enough information in ultra-low and very-low frequencies to estimate SDNN24 and discriminate cardiovascular risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: