The inequality i "=1 j + n -S ir ap2, was proved by Hilbert and published by Weyl.1 Various proofs were given by Hardy, Littlewood & Plya.2 In this inequality tv is the best possible constant; that is, the maximum value of Y, JL-^-^-/ Z. av ror arbitrary {ap\ is 7r. It is no m " m + n -1/ p longer the best possible sum when the summation is finite; from 1 to N, say. In this case Frazer 3 has shown that (N + 1) sin [_ir/(N + 1)] is better. But this result is not the best possible, and Copsey, Frazer, & Sawyer have published investigations4 based on empirical values of the constant X for N = 1(1)5,10,20, computed by the Royal Aircraft Establishment. Further computations for N = 2(1)20 are being made by the National Physical Laboratory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fairthorne et al. (1949) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: