Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two-bond (13)C-(1)H NMR spin-spin coupling constants ((2)J(CCH)) between C2 and H1 of aldopyranosyl rings depend not only on the relative orientation of electronegative substituents on the C1-C2 fragment but also on the C-O torsions involving the same carbons. The latter dependencies were elucidated theoretically using density functional theory and appropriate model pyranosyl rings representing the four relative configurations at C1 and C2, and a 2-deoxy derivative, to probe the relationship between (2)J(C2,H1) magnitude and sign and the C1-O1 (phi, phi) and C2-O2 (alpha) torsion angles. Related calculations were also conducted for the reverse coupling pathway, (2)J(C1,H2). Computed J-couplings were validated by comparison to experimentally measured couplings. (2)J(CCH) displays a primary dependence on the C-O torsion involving the carbon bearing the coupled proton and a secondary dependence on the C-O torsion involving the coupled carbon. These dependencies appear to be caused mainly by the effects of oxygen lone pairs on the C-H and C-C bond lengths along the C-C-H coupling pathway. New parameterized equations are proposed to interpret (2)J(C1,H2) and (2)J(C2,H1) in aldopyranosyl rings. The equation for (2)J(C2,H1) has particular value as a potential NMR structure constraint for the C1-O1 torsion angle (phi) comprising the glycosidic linkages of oligosaccharides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klepach et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: