Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ab initio molecular orbital calculations using density functional theory (DFT) have been conducted on the aldopentofuranose, 2-deoxy-β- d - erythro -pentofuranose ( 1 ) to evaluate the performance of DFT methodology in structural optimization and NMR spin−spin coupling constant determinations prior to its application in more complex carbohydrate-containing systems. Computed molecular parameters (bond lengths, bond angles, bond torsions) and NMR spin−spin coupling constants ( J ) in the 10 geometrically optimized envelope forms of 1 are compared to those reported previously from HF/6-31G*-optimized geometries. In earlier work, n J CH values were first computed at the HF level using finite-field perturbation theory and a basis set specially designed to economically recover the Fermi-contact contribution to J . Electron correlation effects on the coupling constants were then introduced via second-order Møller−Plesset perturbation (MP2) calculations. The derived correlation corrections (i.e., the MP2 − HF values) were scaled by factors obtained from more elaborate quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD) calculations on related, though necessarily smaller, systems. In the present study, the Fermi-contact components of the J values were computed directly via DFT, presumably recovering the important effects of electron correlation and thus obviating the need for scaling. J CH values (one-, two-, and three-bond) derived from the DFT treatment are compared to scaled couplings obtained previously using HF/MP2 methods. The effect of structural relaxation on J is assessed by direct comparison of HF values for the 13 C− 1 H couplings in both HF- and DFT-optimized geometries. 1 J CC, 2 J CC, 3 J CC, and 2+3 J CC values are computed (DFT) in 1 as a function of ring conformation for the first time, correlation corrections are evaluated by direct comparison with HF calculations, and new structural interpretations of these couplings are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cloran et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: