Key result
Adding heart rate information to a control-to-range artificial pancreas system significantly reduced maximum blood glucose decline during exercise compared to the standard system (-5 vs -29 mg/dL).
Why the study?
Does adding a heart rate signal to a control-to-range artificial pancreas system reduce the risk of hypoglycemia during exercise in adults with type 1 diabetes?
RCT (n=12)
Open-label
Randomized crossover
No
Does adding a heart rate signal to a control-to-range artificial pancreas system reduce the risk of hypoglycemia during exercise in adults with type 1 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: -5% vs -29%
p-value: p=0.022
Adding heart rate monitoring to a closed-loop artificial pancreas system significantly reduces exercise-induced blood glucose decline in patients with type 1 diabetes without compromising overall glycemic control.
Supports heart rate integration into artificial pancreas systems to lower exercise hypoglycemia risk in type 1 diabetes; extends closed-loop algorithms with physiologic signals.
BACKGROUND: We present a clinical trial establishing the feasibility of a control-to-range (CTR) closed-loop system informed by heart rate (HR) and assess the effect of HR information added to CTR on the risk for hypoglycemia during and after exercise. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twelve subjects with type 1 diabetes (five men, seven women; weight, 68.9 ± 3.1 kg; age, 38 ± 3.3 years; glycated hemoglobin, 6.9 ± 0.2%) participated in a randomized crossover clinical trial comparing CTR versus CTR+HR in two 26-h admissions, each including 30 min of mild exercise. The CTR algorithm was implemented in the DiAs portable artificial pancreas platform based on an Android(®) (Google, Mountainview, CA) smartphone. We assessed blood glucose (BG) decline during exercise, the Low BG Index (LBGI) (a measure of hypoglycemic risk), number of hypoglycemic episodes (BG <70 mg/dL) and overall glucose control (percentage time within the target range 70 mg/dL ≤ BG ≤ 180 mg/dL). RESULTS: Using HR to inform the CTR algorithm reduced significantly the BG decline during exercise (P=0.022), indicated marginally lower LBGI (P=0.3) and fewer hypoglycemic events during exercise (none vs. two events; P=0.16), and resulted in overall higher percentage time within the target range (81% vs. 75%; P=0.2). LBGI and average BG remained unchanged overall, during recovery, and overnight. CONCLUSIONS: HR-informed closed-loop control can be implemented in a portable artificial pancreas. Although closed loop has been shown to reduce hypoglycemia, adding HR signal may further limit the risk for hypoglycemia during and immediately after exercise. The most prominent effect of adding HR information is reduced BG decline during exercise, without deterioration of overall glycemic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breton et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Type 1 Diabetes (n=12). Control-to-range (CTR) artificial pancreas system enhanced with heart rate (HR) signal vs. Standard control-to-range (CTR) artificial pancreas system was evaluated on Maximum blood glucose decline during exercise (p=0.022). Adding heart rate information to a control-to-range artificial pancreas system significantly reduced maximum blood glucose decline during exercise compared to the standard system (-5 vs -29 mg/dL).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: