Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maintenance optimisation is a multi-objective problem in nature, and it usually needs to achieve a trade-off among the conflicting objectives. In this study, a multi-objective maintenance optimisation (MOMO) model is proposed for electromechanical products, where both the soft failure and hard failure are considered, and minimal repair is performed accordingly. Imperfect preventive maintenance (IPM) is carried out during the preplanned periods, and modelled with a hybrid failure rate model and quasi-renewal coefficient. The initial IPM period and the total number of IPM periods are set as the decision variables, and a MOMO model is developed to optimise the availability and cost rate concurrently. The fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is applied to solve the model. A case study of wind turbine’s gearbox is provided. The results show that there are 30 optimal solutions in the MOMO’s Pareto frontier that can maximise the availability and minimise the cost rate simultaneously. Compared with the single-objective maintenance optimisation, it can provide more choices for maintenance decision, and better satisfy the resource constraints and the customer’s preference. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the effect of age reduction factor on optimisation results is greater than that of failure rate increase factor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: