Key result
In elite speedskaters, 3000 m of racing did not significantly change left ventricular vortex formation time compared to rest (2.9 vs 2.6, p>0.05).
Why the study?
Because elite athletes have supranormal diastolic LV function, the authors sought to assess resting and post-exercise vortex formation time (VFT) and whether VFT predicts immediate post-exercise myocardial performance.
Does resting left ventricular vortex formation time predict myocardial performance immediately post-exercise in elite athletes?
Observational (n=24)
Does resting left ventricular vortex formation time predict myocardial performance immediately post-exercise in elite athletes?
Resting left ventricular vortex formation time may serve as a novel echocardiographic predictor of immediate post-exercise myocardial performance in elite athletes.
Stable vortex formation time after intense racing may indicate preserved function; leaves open its value as a resting predictor pending prospective validation.
Background Efficient transportation of blood through the left ventricle (LV) during diastole depends on vortex formation. Vortex formation time (VFT) can be measured by echocardiography as a dimensionless index. As elite athletes have supranormal diastolic LV function, we aim to assess resting and post-exercise VFT in these athletes and hypothesised that VFT may predict myocardial performance immediately post-exercise. Method Subjects were world class speedskaters training for the Winter Olympic Games. Echocardiographic measurements were obtained before and immediately after 3000 m of racing. VFT was computed as 4×(1−β)/π×α³×left ventricle ejection fraction where β is the fraction of diastolic stroke volume contributed by atrial contraction, α is the biplane end diastolic volume (EDV)1/3 divided by mitral annular diameter during early diastole. Results Baseline VFT was 2.6±0.7 (n=24, age 22±3 years, 67% males). Post-exercise, heart rates increased (64±10 vs 89±12 beats/min, p<0.01); however, VFT was unchanged (2.9±1.0, p>0.05). VFT at rest correlated modestly with post-exertion early diastolic mitral in-flow velocity (E; r=0.59, p=0.01), tissue Doppler-derived early mitral annular velocity (E′; septal and lateral, both r=0.59, p=0.01) and systolic annular velocity (S′; septal: r=0.46, p=0.02 and lateral: r=0.48, p=0.02) but not late diastolic mitral in-flow velocity (A; r=0.06, p>0.05) or annular velocity (A′; septal: r=0.34, p=NS and lateral: r=0.35, p>0.05). Conclusion There was no significant difference between VFT at rest and immediately post-exercise. However, VFT at rest correlated with immediate post-exercise augmented systolic and early diastolic tissue Doppler indicators of myocardial performance in elite athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poh et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Elite athletes (n=24). 3000 m of racing vs. Rest (baseline) was evaluated on Vortex formation time (VFT) (p=>0.05). In elite speedskaters, 3000 m of racing did not significantly change left ventricular vortex formation time compared to rest (2.9 vs 2.6, p>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: