Thermosetting composites were prepared from soybean‐oil‐based polyols (hydroxyl number = 190 mg of KOH/g, [OH]/[NCO] for 2,4‐toluene diisocyanate = 0.9) and fillers (10 wt %) from industrial and agricultural residual wastes. Different types of inexpensive residual wastes were used: black rice husk ash, coconut husk ash, calcined retorted oil shale, and retorted oil shale. The fillers were characterized by thermogravimetric analysis and measurements of particle size distribution, specific surface area, and pore size distribution. The fillers were microporous materials with different chemical compositions, with average particle diameters varying from 5.6 to 76.6 μm, specific surface areas varying between 6 and 165 m2/g, and thermal stability at the polyurethane cure temperature (65°C). All composites were characterized by dynamic mechanical analysis, flexural tests, Shore A hardness tests, thermogravimetric analysis, and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Coconut husk ash, rice husk ash, and retorted oil shale presented better mechanical properties; nevertheless, coconut husk ash and rice husk ash had higher particle sizes, which caused bad dispersion of the filler in the matrix and resulted in nonhomogeneous composites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: