Key result
Elevated lipoprotein (a) (>50 mg/dl) was associated with a 55.3% failure rate to reach target blood pressure, compared to 63.9% in patients with normal levels (≤50 mg/dl).
Why the study?
The study aimed to establish the frequency of achieving target blood pressure levels and lipid spectrum parameters in patients with arterial hypertension and multifocal atherosclerotic lesion with normal versus elevated lipoprotein (a) levels in real clinical practice.
Does elevated Lipoprotein (a) affect the achievement of target blood pressure and lipid parameters in patients with arterial hypertension and multifocal atherosclerosis?
Observational (n=110)
Does elevated Lipoprotein (a) affect the achievement of target blood pressure and lipid parameters in patients with arterial hypertension and multifocal atherosclerosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 55.3% vs 63.9%
Elevated Lp(a) in patients with multifocal atherosclerosis and hypertension is associated with worse lipid spectrum control, highlighting the need for aggressive combination therapy.
Elevated Lp(a) may link to better BP control; leaves open effects on lipid targets and therapy needs.
Aim. To establish the frequency of achieving target of blood pressure (BP) levels and lipid spectrum parameters (LS) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and multifocal atherosclerotic lesion (MFAL) with normal and elevated levels of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) in real clinical practice. Material and methods. The study included 110 patients with AH and MFAL, median age was 59.0 (51.0; 64.3) years. Depending on the level of Lp(a), all patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 — 72 patients (65.5%), Lp(a) level was ≤50 mg/dl (13.2 (3.7; 21.1)), group 2 — 38 patients (34.5%) Lp(a) level was >50 mg/dl (89.5 (62.5; 110.0)). The diagnosis of MFAL included damage to two or more arterial basins according to carotid artery, abdominal aorta and lower extremities arteries duplex scan. Patients of both groups received antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet therapy. Results. Patients in groups 1 and 2 showed similar blood pressure levels and frequency of antihypertensive therapy use. In both groups, the majority of patients were on a free combination of antihypertensive drugs, only a third of patients used a fixed combination. In most cases, patients of both groups did not reach the target blood pressure levels (63.9% — group 1, 55.3% — group 2), despite the fact that the average blood pressure figures were relatively low (132;83 mmHg in each group). Drug control was also unsatisfactory in both groups, regardless of the level of Lp(a). However, all drug indicators were significantly worse in group 2, despite comparable lipid-lowering therapy, which more often included statin monotherapy. Combination therapy with lipid-lowering drugs was used in patients of groups 1 and 2 only in 20.8% and 10.5%, respectively. Parameters of low-grade inflammation high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 did not differ between the groups and did not exceed the reference values. Conclusion. An increased level of Lp(a) may be accompanied by drug disorders and increased BP in patients with MFAL. Due to the lack of effective Lp(a) reducing therapy, the prevention of cardiovascular events in such patients should focus on BP and lipid spectrum correction. The use of fixed combinations, including antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs, can lead to improved adherence to therapy, increased BP and LS control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vedenskaya et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Arterial hypertension and multifocal atherosclerosis (n=110). Elevated lipoprotein (a) (>50 mg/dl) vs. Normal lipoprotein (a) (≤50 mg/dl) was evaluated on Failure to reach target blood pressure levels. Elevated lipoprotein (a) (>50 mg/dl) was associated with a 55.3% failure rate to reach target blood pressure, compared to 63.9% in patients with normal levels (≤50 mg/dl).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: