Key result
Treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir significantly reduced presenteeism impairment (3.53% vs 7.58%; P<0.0001), projecting $2.7 billion in annual savings.
Why the study?
Does ledipasvir/sofosbuvir improve work productivity and reduce societal costs in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 compared to no treatment?
Does ledipasvir/sofosbuvir improve work productivity and reduce societal costs in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 compared to no treatment?
Treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is projected to yield significant societal cost savings through improved work productivity.
May support productivity gains in treated HCV; leaves open confirmation of economic impact in randomized trials.
UNLABELLED: Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) exhibit reduced work productivity owing to their disease. Historically, most regimens indicated for CHC genotype 1 (GT1) patients were administered with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and/or ribavirin (RBV), which further compromised work productivity during treatment. The aim of this study was to model the impact of LDV/SOF (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir), the first Peg-IFN- and RBV-free regimen for CHC GT1 patients, on work productivity from an economic perspective, compared to receiving no treatment. The WPAI-SHP (Work Productivity and Activity Index-Specific Health Problem) questionnaire was administered to patients across the ION clinical trials (N = 1,923 U.S. patients). Before initiation of treatment, patients with CHC GT1 in the ION trials exhibited absenteeism and presenteeism impairments of 2.57% and 7.58%, respectively. Patients with cirrhosis exhibited greater work productivity impairment than patients without cirrhosis. In total, 93.21% of U.S. patients in the ION trials achieved SVR; these patients exhibited absenteeism and presenteeism impairments of 2.62% (P = 0.76, when compared to baseline) and 3.53% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Monetizing these data to the entire U.S. population, our model projects an annual societal cost of $7.1 billion owing to productivity loss in untreated GT1 CHC patients. Our model projects that, when compared to no treatment, treating all CHC GT1 patients with a regimen with very high viral eradication rates (LDV/SOF) would translate to annual productivity loss savings of $2.7 billion over a 1-year time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with untreated HCV impose a substantial societal burden owing to reduced work productivity. As a result of improvements in work productivity, treatment of CHC GT1 patients with LDV/SOF-based regimens is likely to result in significant cost savings from a societal perspective, relative to no treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younossi et al. (2015) studied Chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 (n=1,923). Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir vs. No treatment (baseline) was evaluated on Presenteeism impairment (p=<0.0001). Treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir significantly reduced presenteeism impairment (3.53% vs 7.58%; P<0.0001), projecting $2.7 billion in annual savings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: