BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to assess safety and antithrombotic efficacy of a regional citrate anticoagulation protocol for postdilutional online hemodiafiltration (HDF) with calcium-containing dialysate and infusate. METHODS: Nineteen postdilutional online HDF procedures with citrate anticoagulation were performed in 9 end-stage renal disease patients. Calcium-containing (1.25 mmol/L dialysate/infusate, 15% (0.51 mol/L) trisodium citrate and 1 mol/L calcium chloride (when necessary) were used; the blood flow was 300 ml/min. Antithrombotic effect was assessed visually after HDF at 3 points: the dialyzer, arterial bubble trap, and venous bubble trap, using a score of 5 (excellent anticoagulation) to 1 (total clotting). The study was terminated prematurely due to frequent clotting in the venous bubble trap. RESULTS: The mean duration of HDF was 4.3 +/- 0.9 hours; infusion volume was 13 +/- 2 L. Almost half of the HDF procedures (9/19, 47%) were completed with some difficulty: in 1 case (1/19, 5%) there was total system clotting; in the other 8 cases, system clotting was threatening and dialysis was terminated prematurely, but in only 4/19 cases (21%) prior to 4-hour duration. The main point of clot formation was the venous bubble trap (score 2.6 +/- 1.0), while anticoagulation was very good at the dialyzer (4.0 +/- 1.2) and excellent at the arterial bubble trap (4.8 +/- 0.9). No side effects were noted, and metabolic consequences were moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Regional citrate anticoagulation using calcium-containing dialysate/infusate during postdilutional online hemodiafiltration results in a high incidence of venous bubble trap clotting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buturović‐Ponikvar et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: