This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Nickel(II) complexes supported by a series of tpa {tris[(pyridin-2-yl)methyl]amine} ligand derivatives containing different numbers of phenyl substituent on the 6-position of pyridine donor group (Phntpa, n = 0–3) have been prepared and structurally characterized. Ligand tpa and its derivatives with one or two 6-Ph substituent(s) (Ph0tpa, Ph1tpa, and Ph2tpa) afforded nickel(II) complexes 1[0], 1[1], and 1[2] with a distorted octahedral geometry, whereas the ligand having three 6-Ph groups (Ph3tpa) gave nickel(II) complex 1[3] with a five-coordinate trigonal bipyramidal structure. All the complexes exhibited a high spin ground state (S = 1). Reactivity of the nickel(II) complexes 1[0] and 1[1] toward H2O2 was very poor, whereas 1[2] and 1[3] readily gave bis(μ-oxo)dinickel(III) complexes 2[2] and 2[3], respectively, in the reaction with H2O2 at a low temperature. The bis(μ-oxo)dinickel(III) complexes 2[2] and 2[3] gradually decomposed to cause an aromatic hydroxylation reaction of one of the 6-Ph groups of the supporting ligands. The ligand substituent effects on the formation and decomposition processes of the bis(μ-oxo)dinickel(III) complexes are discussed based on the structures and the redox potentials of the starting nickel(II) complexes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tano et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: