Key result
A stepwise conduit puncture approach was successful in 92.3% of patients with Fontan circulation, though puncture time was longer for Goretex versus pericardial conduits (62.0 vs 11.5 min; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Is a stepwise approach to conduit puncture feasible and safe in patients with Fontan circulation undergoing electrophysiological procedures?
Observational (n=13)
Is a stepwise approach to conduit puncture feasible and safe in patients with Fontan circulation undergoing electrophysiological procedures?
A stepwise approach to conduit puncture is feasible and safe for electrophysiological procedures in patients with Fontan circulation, though Goretex conduits require more time and advanced steps than pericardial conduits.
Supports stepwise conduit puncture feasibility in Fontan EP procedures; leaves open need for prospective validation before wider adoption.
Aims: In patients with Fontan circulation, the conduit may be punctured for electrophysiological procedures. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of a stepwise approach to conduit puncture in adults who have undergone Fontan operation. Methods and results: We included 13 consecutive patients with lateral tunnel or extracardiac conduit Fontan circulation [median age (interquartile range), 24.0 (16.0-25.0) years; seven men] who had undergone electrophysiological procedures. We performed a stepwise approach to conduit puncture: 1st, Brockenbrough needle; 2nd, Brockenbrough needle with snare; 3rd, extra-steep Brockenbrough needle with/without snare; 4th radiofrequency transseptal needle with/without snare; 5th, wiring through the puncture; 6th, conduit dilation with angioplasty balloon; 7th, non-compliant or cutting balloon; and 8th, Inoue dilator. In 12 patients, conduit puncture was successful. In two, one, and two patients with a lateral tunnel made of the pericardium or right atrial wall, conduit puncture was performed by steps 1st, 2nd, and 4th, respectively. In one, three, two, and one patient with the Goretex lateral tunnel or extracardiac conduit, conduit puncture was performed by steps 1st, 6th, 7th, and 8th, respectively. Puncture time was significantly longer in patients with Goretex conduits than with pericardial conduits [62.0 (50.0-120.0) and 11.5 (10.0-14.8) min, respectively; P < 0.001]. A snare was necessary in patients with angles ≤ 35° between the conduit wall and vertical line. Conclusion: A stepwise conduit puncture approach is feasible and safe in patients with lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit Fontan circulation. Goretex conduit puncture was more difficult than pericardial conduit puncture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uhm et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Fontan circulation (n=13). Stepwise approach to conduit puncture was evaluated on Successful conduit puncture. A stepwise conduit puncture approach was successful in 92.3% of patients with Fontan circulation, though puncture time was longer for Goretex versus pericardial conduits (62.0 vs 11.5 min; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: