Key result
The SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor satisfied ESH, AAMI, and BHS validation protocols, demonstrating a mean discrepancy with observers of 0.1±4.6 mmHg for SBP and -2.7±5.2 mmHg for DBP.
Why the study?
Does the SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor accurately measure blood pressure compared to standard mercury sphygmomanometry?
Cross-Sectional (n=93)
Does the SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor accurately measure blood pressure compared to standard mercury sphygmomanometry?
Mean Difference: 0.1
The SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor meets international validation criteria (ESH, AAMI, BHS) and is accurate for clinical and home use.
Supports SAA-102 for home BP monitoring; leaves open outcome trials before changing practice.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of a new oscillometric home blood pressure (BP) monitor for arm BP measurement, the SAA-102, developed by the Sensacare Company. DESIGN: Evaluation of the SAA-102 was performed using validation protocols of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), and the British Hypertension Society (BHS). METHODS: The SAA-102 monitor was assessed on 33 participants according to ESH requirements, which are based on four zones of accuracy differing from the mercury standard by 5, 10, 15 mmHg or more. Then the oscillometric monitor was tested on 85 participants according to AAMI criteria which require a mean device-observers discrepancy within 5+/-8 mmHg. Finally, the electronic device was evaluated on 93 participants according to BHS requirements, which are based on five phases: before-use calibration, in-use assessment, after-use calibration, static device validation and report of the results. RESULTS: The SAA-102 passed all phases of the ESH international protocol for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP). The SAA-102 passed also AAMI criteria for SBP and DBP. The mean discrepancy between the SAA-102 and observers was 0.1+/-4.6 and -2.7+/-5.2 mmHg, for SBP and DBP, respectively. According to BHS protocol, the oscillometric monitor achieved final grading of A/A for SBP and DBP, respectively. CONCLUSION: These data show that the SAA-102 device satisfies ESH, AAMI, and BHS protocols for both SBP and DBP and may be recommended for everyday use for BP monitoring at home and in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaetta et al. (2007) reported a cross-sectional. SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor vs. mercury standard and observers was evaluated on Device accuracy according to ESH, AAMI, and BHS protocols (mean discrepancy 0.1+/-4.6 mmHg for SBP and -2.7+/-5.2 mmHg for DBP). The SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor satisfied ESH, AAMI, and BHS validation protocols, demonstrating a mean discrepancy with observers of 0.1±4.6 mmHg for SBP and -2.7±5.2 mmHg for DBP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: