Superconducting stiffness ρs and coherence length ξ are usually determined by measuring the penetration depth λ of a magnetic field and the upper critical field Hc2 of a superconductor (SC), respectively. However, in magnetic SC, which is iron-based, this could lead to erroneous results, since the internal field could be very different from the applied one. To overcome this problem in Fe1+ySexTe1−x with x∼0.5 and y∼0 (FST), we measured both quantities with the Stiffnessometer technique. In this technique, one applies a rotor-free vector potential A to a superconducting ring and measures the current density j via the ring’s magnetic moment m. ρs and ξ are determined from London’s equation, j=−ρsA, and its range of validity. This method is particularly accurate at temperatures close to the critical temperature Tc. We find weaker ρs and longer ξ than existing literature reports, and critical exponents which agree better with expectations based on the Ginzburg–Landau theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peri et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: