Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Yoonjung Kim 1 , Mee-Yon Cho 2 , Juwon Kim 3 , Sung Nam Kim 4 , Seoung Chul Oh 5 and Kyung-A Lee 1 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 2 Department of Pathology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea 4 Department of Pathology, Samkwang Medical Labotories, Seoul, Korea 5 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea Correspondence to: Kyung-A Lee, email: kal1119@yuhs.ac Juwon Kim, email: Juwon76@yonsei.ac.kr Keywords: gastric cancer, molecular subtyping, germline mutation, somatic mutaiton, targeted sequencing Received: October 26, 2016 Accepted: June 20, 2017 Published: July 22, 2017 ABSTRACT Recently, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network and Asian Cancer Research Group provided a new classification of gastric cancer (GC) to aid the development of biomarkers for targeted therapy and predict prognosis. We studied associations between genetically aberrant profiles of cancer-related genes, environmental factors, and histopathological features in 107 paired gastric tumor-non-tumor tissue GC samples. 6.5% of our GC cases were classified as the EBV subtype, 17.8% as the MSI subtype, 43.0% as the CIN subtype, and 32.7% as the GS subtype. The distribution of four GC subgroups based on the TCGA and our dataset were similar. The MSI subtype showed a hyper-mutated status and the best prognosis among molecular subtype. However, molecular classification based on the four GC subtypes showed no significant survival differences in terms of overall survival ( p = 0.548) or relapse-free survival (RFS, p =0.518). The P619fs * 43 in ZBTB20 was limited to MSI group (n= 5/19, 26.3%), showing similar trends observed in TCGA dataset. Genetic alterations of the RTK/RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways were detected in 34.6% of GC cases (37 individual cases). We also found two cases with likely pathogenic variants (NM_004360.4: c. 2494 G>A, p.V832M ) in the CDH1 gene. Here, we classified molecular subtypes of GC according to the TCGA system and provide a critical starting point for the design of more appropriate clinical trials based on a comprehensive analysis of genetic alterations in Korean GC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: