This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECT: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) and the subjective visual horizontal (SVH) (or vertical [SVV]) have both been considered tests of otolith function: ocular-VEMPs (oVEMPs) utricular function, cervical VEMPs (cVEMPs) saccular function. Some studies have reported association between decreased oVEMPs and SVH, whereas others have not. DESIGN: A retrospective study of test results. SETTING: A tertiary, neuro-otology clinic, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. METHOD: We analyzed results in 130 patients with acute vestibular neuritis tested within 5 days of onset. We sought correlations between the SVH, oVEMPs, and cVEMPs to air-conducted (AC) and bone-conducted (BC) stimulation. RESULTS: The SVH deviated to the side of lesion, in 123 of the 130 AVN patients, by 2.5 to 26.7 degrees. Ninety of the AVN patients (70%) had abnormal oVEMPs to AC, BC or both stimuli, on the AVN side (mean asymmetry ratio ± SD [SE]): (64 ± 45.0% [3.9]). Forty-three of the patients (35%) had impaired cVEMPs to AC, BC or both stimuli, on the AVN side, [22 ± 41.6% (4.1)]. The 90 patients with abnormal oVEMP values also had abnormal SVH. Correlations revealed a significant relationship between SVH offset and oVEMP asymmetry (r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and a weaker relationship between SVH offset and cVEMP asymmetry (r = 0.56, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that after an acute unilateral vestibular lesion, before there has been a chance for vestibular compensation to occur, there is a significant correlation between the SVH, and oVEMP results. The relationship between SVH offset and oVEMP amplitude suggests that both tests measure utricular function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannigan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: