Key result
Nonexercisers performing forward lunges exhibited significantly shorter step length (p=0.033), lower peak center of mass velocity, and restricted hip extension (p<0.001) compared with exercisers.
Why the study?
The lower limb and trunk kinematics of exercisers and nonexercisers during forward lunges were compared to determine the movement characteristics of nonexercisers.
What are the kinematic differences in the lower limbs and trunk between nonexercisers and exercisers during forward lunges?
Cross-Sectional (n=24)
What are the kinematic differences in the lower limbs and trunk between nonexercisers and exercisers during forward lunges?
Nonexercisers exhibit restricted hip extension and compensatory posterior trunk tilt during forward lunges, suggesting a need for upright trunk control focus in early exercise instruction.
May inform lunge modifications for nonexercisers; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Objective In this study, the lower limb and trunk kinematics of exercisers and nonexercisers during forward lunges were compared to determine the movement characteristics of nonexercisers. Methods Three-dimensional kinematic data were collected from 11 nonexercisers and 13 exercisers using a motion capture system (240 Hz) with 17 inertial measurement units. Joint angles at the hip, knee, and ankle joints as well as trunk inclination angles were calculated. Differences throughout the lunge cycle were compared using statistical parametric mapping. Results Compared with exercisers, nonexercisers had significantly shorter step length (p = 0.033) and lower peak center of mass velocity (forward: p = 0.005, backward: p = 0.016). Additionally, hip extension in the supporting leg was significantly smaller in nonexercisers than in exercisers (p < 0.001), accompanied by significantly smaller peak flexion angles in the leading leg’s hip (p = 0.022), knee (p = 0.036), and ankle (p = 0.001) joints. The trunk of nonexercisers exhibited significantly greater posterior tilt during the initiation phase (0%–16.3%, p = 0.040) and completion phase (92.5%–100%, p = 0.048) of the movement compared with that of exercisers. Conclusion The lunge movement in nonexercisers was characterized by restricted hip extension in the supporting leg, which may be associated with reduced forward progression and smaller flexion angles in the leading leg. Furthermore, the posterior trunk tilt observed during the initiation and completion phases may reflect compensatory movement patterns related to trunk control and balance demands, which may warrant attention in relation to potential injury-related concerns. For individuals without exercise habits, these findings suggest that upright trunk control during single-leg stance may be considered as one possible focus in early-stage exercise instruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunimi et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy individuals (exercisers and nonexercisers) (n=24). Nonexerciser status vs. Exerciser status was evaluated on Hip extension in the supporting leg (p=<0.001). Nonexercisers performing forward lunges exhibited significantly shorter step length (p=0.033), lower peak center of mass velocity, and restricted hip extension (p<0.001) compared with exercisers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: