Key result
Oral anticoagulant therapy was associated with an overall mean convenience score of 68.9% and satisfaction score of 69.4%, with significantly higher convenience scores in females and AF patients.
Why the study?
Oral anticoagulant options have expanded beyond warfarin, and patient preferences regarding dosing, monitoring, and adverse effects can influence prescribing, convenience, and satisfaction.
What are the treatment expectations, convenience, and satisfaction of patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Yes
What are the treatment expectations, convenience, and satisfaction of patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy?
Patients on oral anticoagulants report moderate satisfaction and convenience, with higher convenience scores among females and those with atrial fibrillation, highlighting the importance of addressing individual preferences.
BACKGROUND: Warfarin has long been the only oral anticoagulant (OAC) available, but options now include non-vitamin K antagonists. Prescribing an OAC may be influenced by patient factors and preferences influenced by dosing, monitoring, and adverse effects, which may ultimately impact patient satisfaction and convenience. The aim of this study was to explore the perception of OAC treatment by Australian patients in terms of treatment expectations, convenience, and satisfaction. METHODS: The Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire was distributed to patients dispensed OAC medication from three pharmacies in South-East Queensland. Responses to questions using a five-point Likert scale were collated and mean results utilised to assess expectations, convenience, and satisfaction, including an analysis across demographic groups. RESULTS: A total of 56 (26.8%) surveys were returned, with the majority of respondent's male (58.2%). Highest mean scores for treatment expectation were for an OAC that was easy to take (4.85 ± 0.79) and that could be taken care of by the respondents themselves (4.11 ± 1.14). The mean overall score for convenience was 68.90 ± 11.44% and for satisfaction 69.43 ± 16.58%. Significantly higher mean convenience scores were found in females and patients with atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' highest expectations were for an OAC that would be easy to take, and overall satisfaction and convenience was around 69%. Factors including demographics can influence perceptions of therapy, and addressing individual preferences for OAC therapy may increase ratings of satisfaction and convenience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gospos et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Patients requiring oral anticoagulation (n=56). Oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment was evaluated on Treatment expectations, convenience, and satisfaction. Oral anticoagulant therapy was associated with an overall mean convenience score of 68.9% and satisfaction score of 69.4%, with significantly higher convenience scores in females and AF patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: