Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The role of serum CYFRA 21-1 level in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains to be defined. To re-evaluate the impact of serum CYFRA 21-1 in NSCLC survival, we performed this meta-analysis. Databases were searched to identify relevant studies reported after the publication of a meta-analysis in 2004. Totally, 31 studies with 6394 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled Hazard ratios (HRs) indicated that high CYFRA 21-1 level was associated with poor prognosis on overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLC (HR = 1.60; 95%CI = 1.36-1.89; P < 0.001). The pooled HRs were 2.18 (95%CI = 1.70, 2.80; P = 0.347) for patients at stage I-IIIA and 1.47 (95%CI = 1.02, 2.11; P < 0.001) for stage IIIB-IV. When stratified by surgical intervention, pooled HRs were 1.94 (95%CI = 1.42-2.67; P < 0.001) for studies with surgery and 1.24 (95%CI = 0.79-1.95; P < 0.001) for studies without surgery. Significant associations were also found in the patients treated with EGFR-TKIs (HR = 1.83; 95%CI = 1.31-2.58; P = 0.011) and platinum-based regimen (HR = 1.53; 95%CI = 1.18-1.99; P = 0.001). Meta-analysis of CYFRA 21-1 related to PFS was performed and pooled HR was 1.41 (95%CI = 1.19-1.69; P < 0.001). Our results indicate that high level of serum CYFRA 21-1 is a negative prognostic indicator of patients with NSCLC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: