Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In-home services are a core component of family preservation services and were developed as an alternative to out-of-home placement for children and adolescents in need of intensive psychosocial intervention. Extant studies that evaluate the effectiveness of in-home service have been criticized because they often do not use reliable and valid outcome measures. In this study we describe and evaluate an in-home program used by a large multistate health care organization in the Rocky Mountain region. An outcome measure that is currently being used by several managed care companies, the Youth Outcome Questionnaire (Burlingame, Wells, & Lambert, 1995), was used to objectively evaluate response to treatment in 104 patients ranging in age from 4 to17 who received in-home care. Using Jacobson and Truax's (1991) method, 62% of these patients demonstrated reliable improvement and 28% were classified as meeting the recovery criterion. Fiscal, patient care, and future research implications for in-home care are explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mosier et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: