This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose: With anti-VEGF-based treatments for wet AMD requiring frequent injections, it is often burdensome to both patients and healthcare providers. To explore its possibility as a desirable alternative, we investigated the therapeutic potential of a recombinant adeno-associated virus 2 expressing a soluble variant of VEGF receptor-1 (rAAV2-sVEGFRv-1) in a laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model, as CNV is a defining feature of AMD progression. Methods: C57/B6 mice were intravitreally administered with rAAV2-sVEGFRv-1, rAAV2-GFP, or clinically used bevacizumab after CNV lesions were induced via laser photocoagulation. Immunostaining was performed with phalloidin and CD31 to measure CNV extensiveness, F4/80 and CD11b for inflammatory cell infiltration, and pan-cytokeratin to visualize fibrotic progression. Results: rAAV2-sVEGFRv-1 (5.0 × 107 viral genomes) possesses antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic properties. rAAV2-sVEGFRv-1 was demonstrated to significantly decrease retinal CNV lesion size (1336 ± 186) when compared to rAAV2-GFP-treated (2949 ± 437, P = 0.0043), mock-treated (3075 ± 265, P = 0.0013), and bevacizumab-treated models (995 ± 234). Infiltration by inflammatory cells significantly decreased with rAAV2-sVEGFRv-1 administration, while groups treated with rAAV2-GFP did not. Additionally, antiapoptotic activity was observed via TUNEL assay in rAAV2-sVEGFRv-1 (16.0 ± 3.6) and rAAV2-GFP (46.0 ± 7.5, P = 0.003). Overall, the rAAV2-sVEGFRv-1 viral vector was positively comparable to bevacizumab, indicating it as effective as approved therapeutics. Conclusions: The ability of a low dose of rAAV2-sVEGFRv-1 to exert a therapeutically relevant anti-VEGF effect in a CNV model is demonstrated, and strongly suggests gene therapy as an effective and convenient treatment for sustained VEGF suppression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: