Syntheses of the new complexes [RuL13]1, [Rul12(acac)]2, [RuL12(bipy)][PF6]3, [CrL13]4, [CrL12(acac)]5 and [CrL22][PF6]6[HL1= 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)pyridine, HL2= 6-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-2,2′-bipyridine, Hacac = pentane-2,4-dione, bipY = 2,2′-bipyridine] have been carried out. The ruthenium(III) complexes 1–3 all show reversible +3/+4 and +2/+3 waves in their cyclic voltammograms. Together with some previously reported complexes, a full set of electrochemical data is now available for ruthenium complexes with donor sets varying from N6 to N3O3(where N denotes a pyridyl donor and O a phenolate donor); there is a monotonic decrease of 0.75 V in the RuII-RuIII couple per additional phenolate in the co-ordination sphere. Both 1 and 2 have typical rhombic EPR spectra, but the spectrum of 3 is only consistent with formation of a mixture of cis and trans isomers. The chromium(III) complexes show similar variations in the potentials of their metal-centred reductions with donor set although the relationship is not linear. X-Ray analysis showed the both 4 and 6 have pseudo-octahedral crystal structures. Complex 4 crystallises in the chiral space group Fdd2 and therefore spontaneously resolves on crystallisation; 6 has a π-stacking interaction between aromatic residues of adjacent complex units, with an average separation of 3.71 Å between the atoms of one aromatic ring and the mean plane of the other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bardwell et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: