Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protease-activated receptors (PARs) 1 and 2 modulate the gastric and intestinal smooth muscle motility in vitro. In the present study, we examined if activation of PAR-2 and PAR-1 could alter gastrointestinal transit in mice. 2. Intraperitoneal administration of the PAR-2-activating peptide SLIGRL-NH(2), but not the inactive control LSIGRL-NH(2), at 1 - 5 micromol kg(-1), in combination with the aminopeptidase inhibitor amastatin at 2.5 micromol kg(-1), facilitated gastrointestinal transit in a dose-dependent manner. The human PAR-1-derived peptide SFLLR-NH(2) and the specific PAR-1 agonist TFLLR-NH(2), but not the inactive control FSLLR-NH(2), at 2.5 - 10 micromol kg(-1), in combination with amastatin, also promoted gastrointestinal transit. 3. The Ca2+-activated, small conductance K+ channel inhibitor apamin at 0.01 micromol kg(-1) significantly potentiated the actions of SLIGRL-NH(2) and TFLLR-NH(2) at subeffective doses. 4. The increased gastrointestinal transit exerted by either SLIGRL-NH(2) at 5 micromol kg(-1) or TFLLR-NH(2) at 10 micromol kg(-1) was completely abolished by the L-type Ca2+ channel inhibitor verapamil at 61.6 micromol kg(-1). In contrast, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein at 18.5 micromol kg(-1) failed to modify the effects of the agonists for PAR-2 or PAR-1. 5. These findings demonstrate that PAR-1 and PAR-2 modulate gastrointestinal transit in mice in vivo. Our data also suggest that the PAR-1-and PAR-2-mediated effects are modulated by apamin-sensitive K+ channels and are dependent on activation of L-type Ca2+ channels, but independent of tyrosine kinase. Our study thus provides novel evidence for the physiological and/or pathophysiological roles of PARs 1 and 2 in the digestive systems, most probably during inflammation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawabata et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: