In its original definition, guild refers to a group of syntopic organisms using a given resource in a similar way, without regard to their taxonomic relationships. I contend that this term is abused by researchers that define guilds in a-priori manner (any group of syntopic, taxonomically related organisms, i.e., an assemblage), and misused by researchers that define guilds a-posteriori (subgroups within assemblages). I discuss the consequences of these practices and the relationship between guild structure and competition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaksić et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: