The present study examined the development of latent inhibition in a number of inbred strains of mice. C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, C3H/Ibg, BALB/cByJ, A/J, CBA/J, 129/SvevTac, 129/SvJ, and AKR/J mice were screened for the development of latent inhibition. The latent inhibition paradigm involved 1 day of either 40 preexposures to the conditioned stimulus (CS) or no preexposure. On the following training day, the CS was twice paired with a shock unconditioned stimulus (US). On a subsequent test day, the strength of the CS-US association was measured. Mice preexposed to the CS should show a weaker CS-US association, which would reflect development of latent inhibition. Significant between-strain differences existed. The 129/Svev, C57BL/6, BALB/cByJ, AKR, and DBA/2 mice developed latent inhibition, but 129/SvJ, CBA, A, and C3H mice did not. Thus, genetic variance contributes to variability in the development of latent inhibition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gould et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: