Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of 23 substituted biphenyl, phenylpyridine, and bipyridine derivatives were doped in the nematic liquid crystal host 4‘-(pentyloxy)-4-biphenylcarbonitrile over the mole fraction range 0.005 ≤ x d ≤ 0.04. The effect of each biaryl dopant on the nematic−isotropic phase transition temperature (clearing point) of the liquid crystal phase was determined by differential scanning calorimetry as a function of dopant mole fraction for a wide range of substituents and expressed as a constant of proportionality δ I . The molecular polarizability (α) and electrostatic character ( E HOMO ) of each dopant were estimated using ab initio calculations at the HF/3-21G* level. Analysis of the combined δ I data with respect to α and E HOMO by multilinear regression showed that a reasonable correlation exists between δ I and a linear combination of α and E HOMO ( R 2 = 0.81) which represents a statistically significant improvement over correlations between δ I and α ( R 2 = 0.72) and between δ I and E HOMO ( R 2 = 0.56). These results provide evidence that arene−arene interactions in the absence of a ternary solvent are controlled by both electrostatic and dispersion forces. In this work, dispersion forces were shown to strongly influence the stability of the nematic phase, with a secondary influence coming from electrostatic forces. Furthermore, the results suggest that charge-transfer complexation and molecular dipole−dipole interactions do not have an appreciable effect on the stability of arene−arene interactions in the nematic phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: