Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present work presents indirect solar drying with or without a tomato drying unit and the mathematical modelling of the indirect solar drying system with or without a storage unit. Heat and mass transfer equations were used to predict the thermal behaviour of solar drying with or without a tomato unit. During the experiment, the tomatoes were dried to an average final moisture content of 0.12 kgwater/kgms with an average initial water content of 17.6 kgwater/kgms. The experimental data were fitted to eight (08) different mathematical thin film drying models. These models were compared using the coefficient of determination R 2 , Ki-square χ 2 and the square root of the root mean square error RMSE. The results show that Page’s model best describes the drying curve characteristic of tomatoes. This Page’s model gives a higher value of determination R 2 =0.9942 and lower values of Ki-square χ 2 =0.02797 and RMSE = 0.00704, compared with the seven (07) other mathematical methods used to describe the thermal behavior of tomato solar drying.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tera et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: