A systematic investigation of the translation of cotton fiber length distribution and fiber bundle tenacity into single yarn tenacity is reported. The mathematical model proposed is: Y = af (l, x) × S + b where Y is single yarn tenacity, a and b are constants, S is fiber bundle tenacity, l is length distribution of the cotton, x is critical length, and f( l, x) is a numerical value termed “effective weight” which is dependent upon the entire fiber length distribution. The investigation was carried out over a wide range of twists and yarn numbers, the latter ranging from 15/1 (40 tex) to 80/1 (7.2 tex). The optimum f( l, x) was selected, and it was found that fibers shorter than about 1/8 in. do not contribute to yarn tenacity. Similarly, a 1/8-in. portion of each longer fiber is ineffective. This may be viewed as implying physically that, on the average, the 1/8-in. tip at each end of each fiber does not contribute to the yarn tenacity. Hence, the degree of translation of fiber bundle tenacity to yarn tenacity is a function of the entire length distribution. An interesting finding of this investigation is that the “zero”-gauge fiber bundle test is superior to the ⅛-in.-gauge length test as a criterion for relating bundle to yarn tenacity if the zero-gauge value is modified by the effective weight, i.e. f( l, x) above.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tallant et al. (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: