Key result
Coronary sinus side branch stenting was successfully performed in 98.6% of patients to stabilize left ventricular leads, with low rates of re-operation (0.5%) during a median 39-month follow-up.
Why the study?
Does bare metal coronary stent implantation in a coronary sinus side branch improve lead stabilization in patients undergoing CRT implantation with unstable lead position?
Observational (n=403)
No
Does bare metal coronary stent implantation in a coronary sinus side branch improve lead stabilization in patients undergoing CRT implantation with unstable lead position?
Coronary sinus side branch stenting is a safe and effective method for stabilizing CS leads during CRT implantation in cases of instability or phrenic nerve stimulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports CS side branch stenting for unstable LV leads in CRT; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Objective We describe a method to stabilize CS lead position using stent implantation in a CS side branch to anchor the electrode to the wall of the vein, in cases of intraoperative or postoperative lead dislocation, unstable lead position and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). Methods 403 patients were treated with stenting. After finding the desired lead position bare metal coronary stent was introduced via another guide wire, but in the same CS sheath. The stent was deposited 5–35 mm proximal to the tip of the electrode with a pressure of 6 to 14 atmospheres. Results Mechanical damage of the CS side branch or pericardial effusion was not observed. During follow-up (median 39, 23–48, max. 82 months) re-operation was necessary in only two patients because of high pacing threshold, while repositioning with ablation catheter was performed in 7 cases because of PNS. Impedance measurements did not suggest lead insulation failure. Transvenous extraction of stented CS leads was successful after 3, 18 and 49 months, while 4 leads were extracted easily during heart transplantation. Conclusion Stent implantation to stabilize CS lead position seems to be effective and safe for the prevention and treatment of CS lead dislocation in special cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szilágyi et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=403). Coronary sinus side branch stenting was evaluated on Successful coronary sinus side branch stenting. Coronary sinus side branch stenting was successfully performed in 98.6% of patients to stabilize left ventricular leads, with low rates of re-operation (0.5%) during a median 39-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: