Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, we report the evolution of the dielectric behavior from a dielectric relaxor to a ferroelectric relaxor with variation of Bi concentration in (Sr1−1.5xBix)TiO3 (0⩽x⩽0.2). In the doping range 0.0005⩽x⩽0.002, two dielectric modes A and B are induced. The temperature (Tm) where the permittivity maximum occurs for modes A and B is independent of Bi concentration and of dc electric fields. The complex permittivity of modes A and B follows the empirical Cole–Cole equation. The relaxation time for modes A and B follows the Arrhenius law. The dielectric possessing this type of dielectric behavior is named as a “dielectric relaxor.” At x⩾0.0033, an additional mode C appears, whose Tm increases with increasing Bi concentration. The complex permittivity for mode C does not follow the Cole–Cole equation. The relaxation time of mode C follows the Vogel–Fulcher law, indicating typical relaxor-ferroelectric behavior. In this work, we refer it to a “ferroelectric relaxor” mode. In the range of 0.0033⩽x⩽0.133, the coexistence of the dielectric-relaxor modes and the ferroelectric-relaxor mode is observed. In the samples doped with higher Bi concentration, modes A and B gradually merge into mode C, and only ferroelectric-relaxor behavior remains at x⩾0.133. This system provides a composition-controlled example of evolution from a “dielectric relaxor” to a “ferroelectric relaxor.” In addition, some controversial interpretations of the dielectric behavior of the Bi doped SrTiO3 solid solutions in the literature are discussed, and the polarization relaxation species of modes A and B are attributed to Bi ions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhi Yu (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: