Key result
Passive whole-body accelerations did not significantly alter the EEG microstate architecture compared to static rest, with explained variance remaining at 76.3% across all conditions (p=0.777).
Why the study?
To provide optimal individualized care in the emergency room, the study investigated whether evaluating collateral cranial vessels in acute ischemic stroke predicts clinical outcome and infarct size.
Does passive whole-body acceleration alter EEG microstate architecture in healthy volunteers?
Does passive whole-body acceleration alter EEG microstate architecture in healthy volunteers?
p-value: p=0.777
EEG microstate architecture remains invariant during weak passive whole-body accelerations, suggesting it is not altered by vestibular input in the same way it is by visual input.
Microstate stability during weak accelerations supports protocol feasibility in controls; leaves open effects from stronger stimuli or in vestibular disorders.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ertl et al. (2020) conducted a letter in Healthy (n=29). Passive whole-body accelerations vs. Static rest condition was evaluated on Explained variance of EEG microstates (p=0.777). Passive whole-body accelerations did not significantly alter the EEG microstate architecture compared to static rest, with explained variance remaining at 76.3% across all conditions (p=0.777).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: