Key result
The SPLINTS system demonstrated acceptable within-group agreement (rwg >.70) and participants scored within one scale point of expert ratings in >90% of skill categories.
Cross-Sectional (n=34)
The SPLINTS system is a reliable tool for rating scrub practitioners' nontechnical skills in simulated scenarios.
Supports simulation-based NTS training evaluation; leaves open real-world validation and outcome linkage.
Background: The Scrub Practitioners’ List of Intraoperative NonTechnical Skills (SPLINTS) system is a new tool for training and assessing scrub practitioner behaviours during surgical operations. Method: Experienced scrub practitioners (n = 34) attended a single day session where they received background training in human factors and nontechnical skills and were trained to use the SPLINTS system. They then rated the scrub practitioners’ nontechnical skill performance in seven videorecorded simulated scenarios and completed a posttraining questionnaire. Results: Withingroup agreement for all three skill categories, and for six of the nine elements, was acceptable ( r wg >.70). Participants could use SPLINTS to accurately score performance compared with expert ratings and were within one scale point of expert ratings in > 90% of skill categories and elements. There was good internal consistency between elements and their categories ( M <.2 of a scale point) and participants reported that the system was complete. Conclusion: The SPLINTS system was deemed adequately reliable, for rating scrub practitioners’ nontechnical skills, using standardized filmed scenarios. Usability of the SPLINTS system in the real operating theatre environment is still to be assessed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flin et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Scrub practitioners' non-technical skills (n=34). SPLINTS system vs. Expert ratings was evaluated on Within-group agreement and accuracy compared with expert ratings (rwg >.70). The SPLINTS system demonstrated acceptable within-group agreement (rwg >.70) and participants scored within one scale point of expert ratings in >90% of skill categories.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: