Key result
Atrial fibrillation in patients with operated valvular heart disease was associated with poorer anticoagulation control (mean TTR 55.7% vs 60.1%; p=0.002) and higher mortality (20.7% vs 5.8%).
Why the study?
There is limited evidence regarding factors that affect anticoagulation control in patients with mechanical or tissue prosthetic valves.
Does the presence of atrial fibrillation affect anticoagulation control and clinical outcomes in patients with operated valvular heart disease receiving vitamin K antagonists?
Cohort (n=456)
Does the presence of atrial fibrillation affect anticoagulation control and clinical outcomes in patients with operated valvular heart disease receiving vitamin K antagonists?
In patients with operated valvular heart disease on vitamin K antagonists, concomitant atrial fibrillation is associated with poorer anticoagulation control and higher all-cause mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant closer INR monitoring in operated valvular patients with AF; leaves open causality and intervention effects.
Background: Good quality anticoagulation among patients with operated valvular heart disease is needed to reduce ischaemic and thromboembolic complications. There is limited evidence regarding factors that affect anticoagulation control in patients implanted with mechanical or tissue prosthetic valve(s). Aim: To examine the quality of and factors that affect anticoagulation control, major adverse clinical events and all-cause death in operated valvular heart disease patients with and without atrial fibrillation who are receiving a vitamin K antagonist. Methods: Quality of anticoagulation were retrospectively assessed among 456 operated valvular heart disease patients [164 (36%) with AF and 290 (64%) without AF] via time in therapeutic range (TTR) (Rosendaal method) and percentage of INRs in range (PINRR) over a median of 6.2 (3.3–8.5) years. VHD was defined by the presence of a mechanical or tissue prosthetic valve at the mitral, aortic, or both sites. Results: Mean age 51 (14.7), 64.5% men. Most (96.1%) had a mechanical prosthesis and 64% had aortic valve replacement. Overall, mean TTR was 58.5% (14.6) and PINRR was 50.1% (13.8). Operated valvular heart disease patients with AF had significantly lower mean TTR and PINRR (TTR: 55.7% (14.2) vs. 60.1% (14.6); p = 0.002, respectively, PINRR: 47.4% (13.5) vs. 51.6% (13.7); p = 0.002, respectively), and a lower proportion of TTR ≥ 70%, despite a similar number of INR tests compared to those without AF. Predictors of TTR < 70% were female sex, AF and anaemia/bleeding history. Significantly higher proportions of operated valvular heart disease patients with AF died (20.7% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.001), but ≥1 MACE rates were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Operated valvular heart disease patients with AF at baseline have poorer anticoagulation control compared to those without AF. The presence of concomitant AF, anaemia/bleeding history and female sex independently predicted poor TTR. Stringent INR monitoring is needed to improve anticoagulation control and prevent major adverse clinical events in patients with operated valvular heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zulkifly et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Operated valvular heart disease (n=456). Atrial fibrillation vs. Without atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) (p=0.002). Atrial fibrillation in patients with operated valvular heart disease was associated with poorer anticoagulation control (mean TTR 55.7% vs 60.1%; p=0.002) and higher mortality (20.7% vs 5.8%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: