Key result
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissection with aberrant right subclavian artery achieved clinical success in 85.7% (6 of 7) of patients.
Why the study?
Aortic dissection with aberrant right subclavian artery is rare and fatal, and its optimal treatment remains controversial.
Is endovascular repair safe and effective in patients with aortic dissection and aberrant right subclavian artery?
Observational (n=7)
No
Is endovascular repair safe and effective in patients with aortic dissection and aberrant right subclavian artery?
Endovascular repair using TEVAR with chimney or branched stent graft techniques appears feasible and safe for the rare condition of aortic dissection with aberrant right subclavian artery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports TEVAR feasibility in rare aortic dissection with aberrant right subclavian artery; leaves open confirmation in larger prospective studies.
OBJECTIVES: Aortic dissection with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is rare but fatal, with its optimal treatment remaining controversial. In this retrospective study, we presented the outcome of endovascular repair for these patients, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to January 2022, seven patients diagnosed with aortic dissection with ARSA in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were enrolled. All these seven patients received thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) within 1 week after their admission to our center. The data of baseline characteristics, imaging parameters, perioperative information, and follow-up were collected till March 2023. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.57 ± 9.41 years. Kommerell diverticulum was found in 2 (28.6%) patients. Among these seven patients, 4 (57.1%) were treated by TEVAR + branched stent graft + chimney technique, 2 (28.6%) were treated by TEVAR + chimney technique, and 1 (14.3%) was treated by TEVAR + chimney and periscope techniques. The mean time of procedures was 196.67 ± 31.18 min. Clinical success was achieved in 6 (85.7%) patients, while 1 (14.3%) patient died of nonaortic related cause. Bird beak configuration was discovered in 4 (57.1%) patients with an average length of 17.87 ± 3.93 mm and angle of 21.9° ±3.70°. One early type I endoleak and one mild cerebral ischemia were discovered, and recovered spontaneously before discharge. The diameter of the aorta remained stable, and no complication was found during the follow-up of the six patients. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of aortic dissection with ARSA was feasible and safe, with a favorable early to mid-term outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Aortic dissection with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) (n=7). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was evaluated on Clinical success. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissection with aberrant right subclavian artery achieved clinical success in 85.7% (6 of 7) of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: