Key result
ACE inhibitor use was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of a history of cancer (OR 0.59) and peptic ulcer disease (OR 0.68) in patients with diabetes.
Why the study?
Does ACE inhibitor therapy reduce the prevalence of cancer and peptic ulcer disease in adults with diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,003)
Yes
Does ACE inhibitor therapy reduce the prevalence of cancer and peptic ulcer disease in adults with diabetes?
In a cross-sectional analysis of adults with diabetes, ACE inhibitor use was associated with a lower self-reported history of cancer and peptic ulcer disease, suggesting potential non-cardiovascular benefits that require further investigation.
ACE inhibitor associations with lower cancer and peptic ulcer history in diabetes should not change practice; leaves open causal effects for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) reduce peripheral vascular resistance via blockage of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). ACE inhibitors are commonly used to treat congestive heart failure and high blood pressure, but other effects have been reported. In this study, we explored the association between ACE inhibitor therapy and the prevalence of comorbid conditions in adults with diabetes METHODS: We surveyed 1003 adults with diabetes randomly selected from community practices. Patients were interviewed at home and self-reported their personal and clinical characteristics including comorbidity. Current medications were obtained by direct observation of medication containers. We built logistic regression models with the history of comorbidities as the outcome variable and the current use of ACE inhibitors as the primary predictor variable. We adjusted for possible confounding by social (age, sex, alcohol drinking, cigarette smoking) and clinical factors (systolic blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), glycosolated hemoglobin (A1C), number of comorbid conditions, and number of prescription medications). RESULTS: ACE users reported a history of any cancer (except the non-life-threatening skin cancers) less frequently than non-users (10% vs. 15%; odd ratio = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [0.39, 0.89]; P = 0.01); and a history of stomach ulcers or peptic ulcer disease less frequently than non-users (12% vs. 16%, odd ratio = 0.70, [0.49, 1.01], P = 0.06). After correcting for potential confounders, ACE inhibitors remained significantly inversely associated with a personal history of cancer (odds ratio = 0.59, [0.39, 0.89]; P = 0.01) and peptic ulcer disease (odd ratio = 0.68, [0.46, 1.00], P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: ACE inhibitor use is associated with a lower likelihood of a history of cancer and peptic ulcers in patients with diabetes. These findings are limited by the cross sectional study design, self-report of comorbid diagnoses, and lack of information on the timing and duration of ACE inhibitor use. Further research is needed to confirm these associations and understand their mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos‐Niño et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetes (n=1,003). ACE inhibitors vs. Non-users of ACE inhibitors was evaluated on History of cancer (excluding non-life-threatening skin cancers) (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39, 0.89, p=0.01). ACE inhibitor use was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of a history of cancer (OR 0.59) and peptic ulcer disease (OR 0.68) in patients with diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: