Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To develop an accurate method of weighing ventilated infants in the clinical setting. SUBJECTS: Two dolls that simulated ventilated infants were adapted to different weights ranging from 745 to 3,995 g. DESIGN: Four methods of weighing ventilated infants were evaluated. The study design used multiple clinical nurses, randomly chosen, to weigh the simulated infants. Freestanding and in-bed scales were used with a simulated ventilated infant being either connected or disconnected from the ventilator tubing for the procedure. RESULTS: The mean weights of the simulated infants measured in the incubator, with or without the ventilator connected, had a mean difference of +/- 2 g from the gold standard. However, the mean weights of the simulated infants measured on the freestanding scales were 12 g < the gold standard of industry calibrated weights (P < 0.001). The measurement error was small both with and without the ventilator connected. This error was proportionally very small for weights over 1,500 g, but was increased for weights < 1,500 g. CONCLUSION: The use of in-bed scales was the most accurate method of weighing simulated infants of all weight categories. This study shows the importance of a consistent and meticulous technique when weighing infants in intensive care. The accuracy of weights is enhanced with the use of in-bed scales, and this is particularly significant in infants less than 1,500 g.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spence et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: