Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness after LASIK for myopia, using ultrasonic pachymetry and Orbscan II measurements, and to evaluate changes in these measurements over time. METHODS: Central corneal thickness measurements obtained by ultrasonic pachymetry and Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, NY) in patients who underwent myopic LASIK between July 2002 and May 2003 were analyzed. The two measurements were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 day and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: In 237 eyes, using the correction factor 0.93, no significant difference was noted in the preoperative central corneal thickness measured by ultrasonic pachymetry (561.89 +/- 28.66 microm) and Orbscan pachymetry (562.28 +/- 28.18 microm) (P =.713). Postoperatively, the difference was statistically significant at day 1 and 1, 3, and 6 months (P < .001), but was not significant at 12 months (P = .130). CONCLUSIONS: Orbscan II measurements of central corneal thickness after myopic LASIK are less than those measured by ultrasonic pachymetry; however, this difference decreases with time and may not be significant after 1 year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: