Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Endowing dental composites with excellent interfacial bonding through filler surface modification is pivotal to improve the physical–mechanical property and prolong the life of composite fillings. In this study, methacrylate-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (MA-POSS) acts as a “molecular bridge” between the commonly used SiO 2 particles and the methacrylate-based resin matrix via a thiol-ene click reaction to construct MA-POSS/SiO 2 (p-SiO 2 ) hybrid particles. Synthesized p-SiO 2 exhibited the roughest surface morphology and had more polymerizable groups, in comparison with SiO 2 and silanized SiO 2 . Furthermore, the p-SiO 2 particles were used as a reinforcement to fabricate bisphenol A glycerolate dimethacrylate/tri(ethyleneglycol) dimethacrylate-based dental composites, where the SiO 2 - and silanized SiO 2 -filled composites served as the control groups, and the filler loading was fixed at 65 wt %. Results of the mechanical properties indicated that the hybrid p-SiO 2 particles significantly improved the flexural strength, flexural modulus, compressive strength, and work of fracture of dental composites, giving improvements of 251.2, 17.89, 122.3, and 1094%, respectively, over the SiO 2 -filled composites due to the strong interfacial interaction between the resin matrix and p-SiO 2 . Additionally, this optimal p-SiO 2 -loaded composite also presented better polymerization shrinkage, acceptable degree of conversion, curing depth, and cell viability. Grafting of MA-POSS onto a filler surface is a promising filler surface modification to improve the resin matrix/filler interfacial interaction, leading to the enhanced overall performance of composites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: