Key result
Eccentric aortic regurgitation progressed from mild to moderate severity significantly more often than central aortic regurgitation (55.6% vs 6.7%, p<0.01) in patients with a ventricular septal defect.
Observational (n=129)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 55.6% vs 6.7%
p-value: p=<0.01
Eccentric aortic regurgitation in patients with right coronary cusp prolapse and VSD is a malignant finding that is highly likely to progress to moderate severity requiring surgical intervention.
Eccentric AR may warrant closer surveillance in VSD; extends risk stratification but leaves optimal management open pending prospective data.
To analyze the clinical significance of eccentric aortic regurgitation (AR) complicating the right coronary cusp prolapse associated with a ventricular septal defect (VSD), the Doppler echocardiograms of 129 patients were reviewed. In 102 patients, AR was classified as mild and in 27 patients it was classified as moderate. Eccentric AR was defined as the jet distributing in an eccentric direction. In 15 patients of the moderate group, AR was already moderate at the initial examination and of these, the AR was eccentric in 14 and central in 1. In 12 patients who initially had mild AR, it became moderate during follow-up. In 7 patients with mild, central AR, 6 worsened to central moderate AR and 1 evolved to eccentric moderate AR. Eccentric mild AR patients all developed eccentric moderate AR. Within the mild AR group, 5 of 9 patients with eccentric AR progressed from mild to moderate, whereas only 7 of 105 patients with central AR did so (p<0.01). In conclusion, eccentric AR may be an advanced finding of the AR associated with right coronary cusp prolapse in some patients, but in others eccentric AR is highly likely to progress and is malignant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomita et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Aortic regurgitation complicating right coronary cusp prolapse and ventricular septal defect (n=129). Eccentric aortic regurgitation vs. Central aortic regurgitation was evaluated on Progression from mild to moderate aortic regurgitation (p=<0.01). Eccentric aortic regurgitation progressed from mild to moderate severity significantly more often than central aortic regurgitation (55.6% vs 6.7%, p<0.01) in patients with a ventricular septal defect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: