This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study demonstrates photocatalytic activity of 1 wt% plasmonic metal (Au, Ag and Cu)–TiO₂ nanocatalysts prepared via photodeposition method for the photo oxidative decomposition of methylene blue (MB 0.01 mM) under visible light (50 mWcm−2) irradiation. Plasmonic metal loaded-TiO₂ photocatalysts absorb with an absorption maximum at localized surface plasmon resonance wavelengths (500–785 nm). It has been observed that pH altered the surface charge (ζ) of TiO₂ (ζ = –4.98, –4.0 and +9.16 at pH = 10, 7 and 3, respectively). The point of zero charge (PZC) at pH 6.3 has been determined from a correlation plot between pH and ζ. Higher rate of degradation was observed at pH = 10 because of electrostatic interaction of cationic MB with anionic TiO₂. Higher photocatalytic activity was shown by Cu–TiO₂ followed by Au–TiO₂ and Ag–TiO₂ photocatalysts in comparison to TiO₂-P25. This enhancement in photocatalytic efficiency is attributed to the plasmonic effect and effective charge separation at the interface between nano size metal deposits and TiO₂ particles. The overall photocatalytic reaction followed pseudo first order kinetics as per Langmuir Hinshelwood kinetic equation. GC and GC-MS studies suggested the formation of thionin after demethylation and derivatives of benzene sulphonic acid which are subsequently degraded to CO₂ after prolonged irradiation time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rather et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: