Key result
The proposed framework for longitudinal multimodal sensors (FLMS) achieved a 7% increase in accuracy and a 13% increase in recall for predicting changes in depression compared to existing methods.
Why the study?
Longitudinal passive mobile sensor data are often small, noisy, and incomplete, requiring a trade-off between user-agnostic and personalized modeling approaches.
The proposed FLMS framework improves the accuracy and recall of predicting depression changes using small, multimodal passive sensor data.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Passive mobile sensing warrants cautious clinical use due to data limitations; leaves open whether novel multimodal models outperform SOTA for small noisy datasets.
BACKGROUND Passive mobile sensing provides opportunities for measuring and monitoring health status in the wild and outside of clinics. However, longitudinal, multimodal mobile sensor data can be small, noisy, and incomplete. This makes processing, modeling, and prediction of these data challenging. The small size of the data set restricts it from being modeled using complex deep learning networks. The current state of the art (SOTA) tackles small sensor data sets following a singular modeling paradigm based on traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms. These opt for either a user-agnostic modeling approach, making the model susceptible to a larger degree of noise, or a personalized approach, where training on individual data alludes to a more limited data set, giving rise to overfitting, therefore, ultimately, having to seek a trade-off by choosing 1 of the 2 modeling approaches to reach predictions. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to filter, rank, and output the best predictions for small, multimodal, longitudinal sensor data using a framework that is designed to tackle data sets that are limited in size (particularly targeting health studies that use passive multimodal sensors) and that combines both user agnostic and personalized approaches, along with a combination of ranking strategies to filter predictions. METHODS In this paper, we introduced a novel ranking framework for longitudinal multimodal sensors (FLMS) to address challenges encountered in health studies involving passive multimodal sensors. Using the FLMS, we (1) built a tensor-based aggregation and ranking strategy for final interpretation, (2) processed various combinations of sensor fusions, and (3) balanced user-agnostic and personalized modeling approaches with appropriate cross-validation strategies. The performance of the FLMS was validated with the help of a real data set of adolescents diagnosed with major depressive disorder for the prediction of change in depression in the adolescent participants. RESULTS Predictions output by the proposed FLMS achieved a 7% increase in accuracy and a 13% increase in recall for the real data set. Experiments with existing SOTA ML algorithms showed an 11% increase in accuracy for the depression data set and how overfitting and sparsity were handled. CONCLUSIONS The FLMS aims to fill the gap that currently exists when modeling passive sensor data with a small number of data points. It achieves this through leveraging both user-agnostic and personalized modeling techniques in tandem with an effective ranking strategy to filter predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mullick et al. (2023) studied Major depressive disorder. Framework for longitudinal multimodal sensors (FLMS) vs. Existing state of the art (SOTA) ML algorithms was evaluated on Prediction of change in depression (7% increase in accuracy and 13% increase in recall). The proposed framework for longitudinal multimodal sensors (FLMS) achieved a 7% increase in accuracy and a 13% increase in recall for predicting changes in depression compared to existing methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: