A new marking technique was developed and used to track individual water flea behaviour. A single clone of Ceriodaphnia reticulata exhibited no significant differences in mean depth, mean activity (antennae beats used in swimming), and mean travel (total vertical displacement) for fast‐green dyed and control animals (n = 30, each treatment). 2. Individual and group antipredator responses were recorded in three vertebrate predator densities (three odour concentrations of green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus; 0.00, 0.03 and 0.10 fish L–1) and four water flea group sizes (1, 5, 15 and 25), with n = 18 for each of the twelve treatment combinations. Water flea groups were probably mixtures of clones. Differences in behaviour after addition of predator odour showed that increasing predator density increased mean depth of marked individuals and mean proportion of water fleas descending. Additionally, increasing prey density decreased both mean depth of marked individuals and mean proportion of water fleas descending. 3. Predator density and prey density had opposing affects on activity and travel for marked individuals. Higher predator density decreased mean activity (antennae beats), yet increased mean travel. Higher prey density increased mean activity, but decreased mean travel. Descending animals altered their swimming pattern by using fewer swimming beats to travel greater vertical distances in the presence of predator odour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seely et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: